Peng Zhang | WARP #3
Villagers in Memory, Peng Zhang, 2019
Peng Zhang is a Chinese artist based in ’s-Hertogenbosch. His work brings the viewer into the rural village Shijian Cun where Zhang spent his childhood. His memories are his treasures that offer opportunities to reconnect to the past that cannot be experienced anymore, but that can be recalled via Zhang’s artworks. Zhang’s work is featured from 16.10. – 15.11.2020 in the third edition of SEA Foundation’s exhibition programme WARP following the exhibitions of Sabine de Graaf and Lisette de Greeuw and preceding the exhibition of Risja Steeghs.
In 2018 Peng Zhang obtained a Master in Fine Arts from AKV/St-Joost Art Academy in ’s-Hertogenbosch. Prior to coming to the Netherlands, he was trained as a painter at the China Academy of Art in Hangzhou, China. Contemporary artist Peng Zhang uses the fields or an allotment Paradise Garden NO.28 (2019) as his artist studio, working with natural low-tech materials and the garden space to reveal his memories. Zhang calls himself a farmer artist – to him the land is just another kind of canvas. Working materials or pigments originate from nature and his inspiration is grounded in rural life, which reflects the simplicity and earthness into his artworks. Zhang’s most recent works relate to land art and earthworks.
Re-growing the memory
Peng Zhang travels back to his home village a few times a year and spends time walking through the countryside and talking to the local farmers. Zhang invites the farming community to participate in the process of creation. This offer of co-creation and collaborative intentions are not always met with understanding, because farming has been the way of sustaining resources for one’s family. It was never related to collaborative work with a stranger. None of the local farmers in Zhang’s village ever perceived their work as an art related activity nor as a work of art in itself. Yet, at the same time, the local villagers slowly abandon the way they used to build their houses, grow their crops or socialize with their neighbours. The younger generation is moving to the city, their way of living is getting instant, urbanized and economically developed as an inevitable process of modernization. Zhang therefore recalls farming practices and lifestyle into his artworks and site-specific interventions.
Peng Zhang does not judge whether life in a Chinese farming village is good or bad, but points out that the disappearance of traditions, craft techniques and skills leaves a gap in Shijian Cun village. Via collection of his childhood memories, Zhang digs in the soil and regrows what is becoming forgotten.
Reactionary vs progressive
While back in Peng Zhang’s village his recreation of rural life might be considered reactionary, the situation in the Netherlands is different. Urbanization has gone through different stages and city dwellers long for reconnection with nature, which might seem to have a rather romantic perception of working with the land. Most Dutch farmers belong to the new upper class of land and animal owners and city gardening is seen in the light of those who seek a relaxing hobby.
Going towards the future, we are deciding what is seen as progressive and what as reactionary. In the talk Why Gaia is not the Globe (2016), philosopher Bruno Latour explains how humanity stands between the two vectors: local vs global or archaic vs future oriented. Depending on how far we position ourselves towards one of those poles, we might perceive our actions (or the actions of others) as being progressive, or in contrary, reactionary. That is where Peng Zhang’s work finds its challenges across the culture and society in which it is presented. In these uncertain times when we already know that economic development has its limitations, we might want to reconsider what it means to go forward. Bruno Latour thus suggests to pay attention to the third vector which he calls Earth or Gaia according to Gaia theory as formulated by James Lovelock. While we try to figure out which direction to go, we are reminded to learn how to belong to the soil and eventually how to land. The work of Peng Zhang has the potential to do so. It has the attitude to reflect upon the past and search for the essence of what the rustic used to be and what it can offer now or in the future. With the hands dirty from the soil and with the simplicity and slowness in the soul we might find out how to experience and deserve the present (as of a present time and of a nature/memory which is gifted).
Belonging to the soil
Peng Zhang does not consider himself an environmental artist, although we might find similar aesthetics in the works of those who place great importance to Ecology. For example, in the work of herman de vries we have learnt how to closely observe nature and understand its interrelation to the human world, but to find out how we became estranged from it. The complex dialogue between culture and nature is reflected in the gratitude for simple meanings like a presentation of the rubbings of soil samples or a documentation of 27 years of his walks in nature – ‘ambulo ergo sum’ – ‘I walk therefore I am’. Although farming, which is in the forefront of Peng Zhang’s interest, can be considered the beginning of nature’s colonization, the work of Peng Zhang is grounded with similar intentions to remind us what is becoming forgotten about our relations and connections to the land. His process comes from thinking through doing. Via his projects Shapes of Rural Life, Villagers in Memory or Weaving Memories (2019), Peng Zhang presents the mementos of times when our activities were dictated by the rhythm of nature, when we relied on our own abilities and the strength of community and shared the knowledge from generation to generation.